SWEET SOPPRESSATA UNCURED CLASSIC PORK SALAME vs SMITHFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
SWEET SOPPRESSATA UNCURED CLASSIC PORK SALAME: 4
vs
SMITHFIELD: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET SOPPRESSATA UNCURED CLASSIC PORK SALAME | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 209 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 20.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET SOPPRESSATA UNCURED CLASSIC PORK SALAME | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET SOPPRESSATA UNCURED CLASSIC PORK SALAME | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 233 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 357 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,321 MG | 1,233 MG |