SWEET & SNAPPLY vs SEA SALT BEEF THINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
SWEET & SNAPPLY: 3
vs
SEA SALT BEEF THINS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET & SNAPPLY | SEA SALT BEEF THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 35.7 g | 46.4 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 28.6 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET & SNAPPLY | SEA SALT BEEF THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET & SNAPPLY | SEA SALT BEEF THINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 143 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 6.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,357 MG | 1,036 MG |