SWEET ITALIAN PORK SAUSAGE vs WATERHILL NATURALS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
SWEET ITALIAN PORK SAUSAGE: 4
vs
WATERHILL NATURALS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET ITALIAN PORK SAUSAGE | WATERHILL NATURALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 314 cal | 232 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 24.3 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET ITALIAN PORK SAUSAGE | WATERHILL NATURALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET ITALIAN PORK SAUSAGE | WATERHILL NATURALS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 29 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 743 MG | 643 MG |