SWEET ITALIAN PLANT-BASED SLICED SAUSAGE vs NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET ITALIAN PLANT-BASED SLICED SAUSAGE: 4
vs
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET ITALIAN PLANT-BASED SLICED SAUSAGE | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 12.7 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 21.8 g | 20.2 g | |
| Fat | 27.3 g | 11.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET ITALIAN PLANT-BASED SLICED SAUSAGE | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 55 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.3 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 309 MG | 167 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 545 MG | 643 MG |