SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING vs CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING: 2
vs
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 438 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 21.9 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 87 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 812 MG | 733 MG |