SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE vs CHICKEN FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE: 6
vs
CHICKEN FRANKS: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 165 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 15.4 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fat | 9.9 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE WITH KALE | CHICKEN FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 692 MG | 1,107 MG |