SWEET GUMMI PEACH RINGS FLAVORED CANDY vs MIDWOOD BRANDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MIDWOOD BRANDS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET GUMMI PEACH RINGS FLAVORED CANDY: 0
vs
MIDWOOD BRANDS: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET GUMMI PEACH RINGS FLAVORED CANDY | MIDWOOD BRANDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 344 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 7.5 g | |
| Carbs | 81.3 g | 65 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET GUMMI PEACH RINGS FLAVORED CANDY | MIDWOOD BRANDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET GUMMI PEACH RINGS FLAVORED CANDY | MIDWOOD BRANDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |