SWEET FRENCH DRESSING vs LITE RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LITE RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET FRENCH DRESSING: 3
vs
LITE RANCH DRESSING: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET FRENCH DRESSING | LITE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 279 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 25.6 g | |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 20.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET FRENCH DRESSING | LITE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET FRENCH DRESSING | LITE RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 419 MG |