SWEET AND TANGY PLANT-BASED BARBECUE WINGS vs NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET AND TANGY PLANT-BASED BARBECUE WINGS: 3
vs
NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET AND TANGY PLANT-BASED BARBECUE WINGS | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 12.2 g | 20.2 g | |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 11.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET AND TANGY PLANT-BASED BARBECUE WINGS | NASHVILLE HOT PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 149 MG | 167 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 369 MG | 643 MG |