SUPERFOOD DRESSING vs CHAMPAGNE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUPERFOOD DRESSING wins in 4 out of 8 nutrient categories
SUPERFOOD DRESSING: 4
vs
CHAMPAGNE DRESSING: 0
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUPERFOOD DRESSING | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 411 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUPERFOOD DRESSING | CHAMPAGNE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 714 MG | 607 MG |