SUGARDALE vs UNCURED HARD SALAMI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED HARD SALAMI wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SUGARDALE: 0
vs
UNCURED HARD SALAMI: 5
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUGARDALE | UNCURED HARD SALAMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 357 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUGARDALE | UNCURED HARD SALAMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUGARDALE | UNCURED HARD SALAMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,533 MG | 1,607 MG |