SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES vs LANCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES: 3
vs
LANCE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 514 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 10.8 g | |
| Carbs | 90.9 g | 62.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 24.3 g | |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUGAR ROLLED STYLE CONES | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 54 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 136 MG | 514 MG |