SUGAR COOKIES vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUGAR COOKIES wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
SUGAR COOKIES: 7
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUGAR COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 407 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 55.6 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUGAR COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 37 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 37 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 444 MG | 172 MG |