STONEWALL LANE vs FIG & BALSAMIC ROASTING GLAZE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
STONEWALL LANE wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
STONEWALL LANE: 7
vs
FIG & BALSAMIC ROASTING GLAZE: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | STONEWALL LANE | FIG & BALSAMIC ROASTING GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 147 cal | 139 cal | |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 7.0 g | 38.9 g | |
| Fat | 11.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | STONEWALL LANE | FIG & BALSAMIC ROASTING GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | STONEWALL LANE | FIG & BALSAMIC ROASTING GLAZE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 364 MG | 0 MG |