SPACE SAVER vs SWEET TEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SPACE SAVER wins in 2 out of 11 nutrient categories
SPACE SAVER: 2
vs
SWEET TEA: 1
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SPACE SAVER | SWEET TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 cal | 38 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 9.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SPACE SAVER | SWEET TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 25 MG | 25 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SPACE SAVER | SWEET TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 4 MG |