SOURDOUGH OLD FASHIONED HARDS PRETZELS vs SHOESTRING POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
SOURDOUGH OLD FASHIONED HARDS PRETZELS: 5
vs
SHOESTRING POTATOES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOURDOUGH OLD FASHIONED HARDS PRETZELS | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 360 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 76 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOURDOUGH OLD FASHIONED HARDS PRETZELS | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 64.3 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOURDOUGH OLD FASHIONED HARDS PRETZELS | SHOESTRING POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 120 MG | 1,036 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,840 MG | 1,500 MG |