SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS vs CIABATTA RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS: 4
vs
CIABATTA RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | CIABATTA RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 263 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 8.8 g | |
| Carbs | 40.4 g | 52.6 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | CIABATTA RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOURDOUGH ENGLISH MUFFINS | CIABATTA RUSTIC EUROPEAN STONE-HEARTH BREADS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 111 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 421 MG | 579 MG |