SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 5
vs
CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 294 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 76.5 g | 76.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOUR WATERMELON FLAVORED MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 83 MG |