SOUR STRAWBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOUR STRAWBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SOUR STRAWBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 4
vs
PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOUR STRAWBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 324 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 79.4 g | 83.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOUR STRAWBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOUR STRAWBERRY MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | PICATAMARIND TAMARIND FLAVORED GUMMY COATED WITH CHILI AND SUGAR GUMMIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 30 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 2,100 MG |