SOUR GUMMI WATERMELON SLICES CANDY vs SNACKS SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOUR GUMMI WATERMELON SLICES CANDY wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
SOUR GUMMI WATERMELON SLICES CANDY: 3
vs
SNACKS SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 1
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOUR GUMMI WATERMELON SLICES CANDY | SNACKS SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 312 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 78.1 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOUR GUMMI WATERMELON SLICES CANDY | SNACKS SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOUR GUMMI WATERMELON SLICES CANDY | SNACKS SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 47 MG | 0 MG |