SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA: 5
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 111 cal | 161 cal | |
| Protein | 26.9 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE WILD CAUGHT TUNA | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 231 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 241 MG | 250 MG |