SOLID WHITE ALBACORE POLE AND LINE CAUGHT TUNA IN WATER & SEA SALT vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOLID WHITE ALBACORE POLE AND LINE CAUGHT TUNA IN WATER & SEA SALT wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SOLID WHITE ALBACORE POLE AND LINE CAUGHT TUNA IN WATER & SEA SALT: 4
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE POLE AND LINE CAUGHT TUNA IN WATER & SEA SALT | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE POLE AND LINE CAUGHT TUNA IN WATER & SEA SALT | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOLID WHITE ALBACORE POLE AND LINE CAUGHT TUNA IN WATER & SEA SALT | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 268 MG | 321 MG |