SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY vs MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY wins in 3 out of 7 nutrient categories
SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOW: 1
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 346 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 84.6 g | 92.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOFT GUMMY ROPE COVERED WITH TINY TANGY CRUNCHY CANDY | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium, Na | 19 MG | 62 MG |