SOFT EATING LIQUORICE vs MARSHMALLOW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT EATING LIQUORICE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SOFT EATING LIQUORICE: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOW: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOFT EATING LIQUORICE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 312 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 77.5 g | 78.1 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOFT EATING LIQUORICE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOFT EATING LIQUORICE | MARSHMALLOW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 175 MG | 47 MG |