SOFT EATING LIQUORICE vs MARSHMALLOW CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW CANDY wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SOFT EATING LIQUORICE: 2
vs
MARSHMALLOW CANDY: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOFT EATING LIQUORICE | MARSHMALLOW CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 350 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 4.8 g | |
| Carbs | 77.5 g | 85.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOFT EATING LIQUORICE | MARSHMALLOW CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOFT EATING LIQUORICE | MARSHMALLOW CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 175 MG | 48 MG |