SOFT CANDY WATERMELON & TAMARIND FLAVOR vs MARSHMALLOW WAFFLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW WAFFLE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SOFT CANDY WATERMELON & TAMARIND FLAVOR: 1
vs
MARSHMALLOW WAFFLE: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOFT CANDY WATERMELON & TAMARIND FLAVOR | MARSHMALLOW WAFFLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 1,300 cal | 365 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.7 g | |
| Carbs | 91.7 g | 87.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOFT CANDY WATERMELON & TAMARIND FLAVOR | MARSHMALLOW WAFFLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOFT CANDY WATERMELON & TAMARIND FLAVOR | MARSHMALLOW WAFFLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 158 MG | 6 MG |