SOFT BAKED COOKIES vs FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOFT BAKED COOKIES wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 8
vs
FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 0
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 478 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 61.9 g | 69.6 g | |
| Fat | 19.1 g | 21.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOFT BAKED COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 405 MG | 348 MG |