SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS vs MILK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS: 6
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | MILK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 550 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 45 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | MILK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOAKED & DEHYDRATED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS | MILK CHOCOLATE ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 208 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 475 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 188 MG |