SO NUTS AND CONFECTIONS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SO NUTS AND CONFECTIONS: 2
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SO NUTS AND CONFECTIONS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 643 cal | 643 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 14.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 39.3 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 14.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SO NUTS AND CONFECTIONS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SO NUTS AND CONFECTIONS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 71 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 18 MG | 0 MG |