SNICKERDOODLE PLANT-BASED COOKIES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNICKERDOODLE PLANT-BASED COOKIES wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
SNICKERDOODLE PLANT-BASED COOKIES: 8
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNICKERDOODLE PLANT-BASED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 404 cal | 406 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 6.3 g | |
| Carbs | 50.9 g | 59.4 g | |
| Fat | 14.0 g | 15.6 g | |
| Fiber | 8.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNICKERDOODLE PLANT-BASED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNICKERDOODLE PLANT-BASED COOKIES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 258 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 439 MG | 328 MG |