SNICKERDOODLE vs APPLE TINY WAFERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
APPLE TINY WAFERS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
SNICKERDOODLE: 0
vs
APPLE TINY WAFERS: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNICKERDOODLE | APPLE TINY WAFERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 423 cal | 370 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 80.8 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 11.5 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 10 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNICKERDOODLE | APPLE TINY WAFERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNICKERDOODLE | APPLE TINY WAFERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 135 MG | 240 MG |