SNACKWELL'S vs WILLIAMS & BENNETT
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILLIAMS & BENNETT wins in 6 out of 13 nutrient categories
SNACKWELL'S: 4
vs
WILLIAMS & BENNETT: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNACKWELL'S | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 457 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 68.6 g | 63.6 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 27.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNACKWELL'S | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 2.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNACKWELL'S | WILLIAMS & BENNETT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 91 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 4.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 186 MG | 250 MG |