SNACK STICK vs TAMARIND BALLS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNACK STICK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SNACK STICK: 5
vs
TAMARIND BALLS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNACK STICK | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 393 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 46.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNACK STICK | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNACK STICK | TAMARIND BALLS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 32 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 335,714 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,464 MG | 18 MG |