SNACK SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS vs FRUIT PUNCH SANTA BEARD HARD CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNACK SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS wins in 2 out of 12 nutrient categories
SNACK SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS: 2
vs
FRUIT PUNCH SANTA BEARD HARD CANDY: 1
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SNACK SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | FRUIT PUNCH SANTA BEARD HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 312 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 80 g | 81.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SNACK SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | FRUIT PUNCH SANTA BEARD HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SNACK SIZE MARSHMALLOW CHICKS | FRUIT PUNCH SANTA BEARD HARD CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 16 MG |