SMOKED TRADITIONAL WILD MACKEREL FILLET vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMOKED TRADITIONAL WILD MACKEREL FILLET wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SMOKED TRADITIONAL WILD MACKEREL FILLET: 4
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMOKED TRADITIONAL WILD MACKEREL FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 263 cal | 82 cal | |
| Protein | 22.8 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 17.5 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMOKED TRADITIONAL WILD MACKEREL FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMOKED TRADITIONAL WILD MACKEREL FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 16 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 391 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 877 MG | 478 MG |