SMOKED PORK RINDS vs OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMOKED PORK RINDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SMOKED PORK RINDS: 6
vs
OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMOKED PORK RINDS | OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 571 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 57.1 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 42.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMOKED PORK RINDS | OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 2.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0.9 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMOKED PORK RINDS | OLD FASHION STYLE PORK CRACKLINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selenium, Se | 30 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,857 MG | 3,429 MG |