SMOKED HAM vs EVERROAST CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMOKED HAM wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
SMOKED HAM: 7
vs
EVERROAST CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMOKED HAM | EVERROAST CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 220 cal | 223 cal | |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 10.8 g | |
| Carbs | 24.9 g | 19.2 g | |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 10.8 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMOKED HAM | EVERROAST CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 6.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMOKED HAM | EVERROAST CHICKEN CAESAR WRAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 141 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 162 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 859 MG | 608 MG |