SMALL TAIL-OFF SHRIMP vs UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMALL TAIL-OFF SHRIMP: 2
vs
UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMALL TAIL-OFF SHRIMP | UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 14.1 g | 15.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMALL TAIL-OFF SHRIMP | UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMALL TAIL-OFF SHRIMP | UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 47 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 459 MG | 487 MG |