SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK vs CHEDDAR SMOKED SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK: 6
vs
CHEDDAR SMOKED SAUSAGE: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK | CHEDDAR SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 354 cal | |
| Protein | 12.3 g | 10.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 9.2 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 29.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK | CHEDDAR SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 1 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK | CHEDDAR SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 123 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 211 MG | 354 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,035 MG | 1,031 MG |