SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK vs CAJUN STYLE CHICKEN SMOKED SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CAJUN STYLE CHICKEN SMOKED SAUSAGE wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK: 2
vs
CAJUN STYLE CHICKEN SMOKED SAUSAGE: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK | CAJUN STYLE CHICKEN SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 298 cal | 165 cal | |
| Protein | 12.3 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 26.3 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK | CAJUN STYLE CHICKEN SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 14.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW SMOKED HICKORY BEEF FRANK | CAJUN STYLE CHICKEN SMOKED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 176 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 211 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,035 MG | 706 MG |