SLOW-ROASTED PORK vs BEEF MEAT LOAF WITH TOMATO SAUCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW-ROASTED PORK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW-ROASTED PORK: 6
vs
BEEF MEAT LOAF WITH TOMATO SAUCE: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | BEEF MEAT LOAF WITH TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 136 cal | 207 cal | |
| Protein | 13.6 g | 12.9 g | |
| Carbs | 4.3 g | 7.9 g | |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 13.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | BEEF MEAT LOAF WITH TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW-ROASTED PORK | BEEF MEAT LOAF WITH TOMATO SAUCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 21 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 229 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 414 MG | 414 MG | Tie |