SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON vs WILD SOCKEYE SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON: 6
vs
WILD SOCKEYE SALMON: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | WILD SOCKEYE SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 cal | 146 cal | |
| Protein | 26.3 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 4.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | WILD SOCKEYE SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | WILD SOCKEYE SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 12 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 912 MG | 485 MG |