SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON vs WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 26.3 g | 24.8 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 2 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 4 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 442 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 912 MG | 44 MG |