SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS: 3
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 83 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 20.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 9 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 159 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 239 MG | 298 MG |