SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS: 1
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 15.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 571 MG |