SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS vs BONELESS SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BONELESS SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLETS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS: 1
vs
BONELESS SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLETS: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | BONELESS SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | BONELESS SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | BONELESS SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 7 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 75 MG | Tie |