SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON: 3
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 16.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD PACIFIC PINK SALMON | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 109 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 29.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 375 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 304 MG | 527 MG |