SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON vs MARKA HIPON BRAND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins in 10 out of 15 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON: 10
vs
MARKA HIPON BRAND: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON | MARKA HIPON BRAND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 102 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON | MARKA HIPON BRAND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 3.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 4.3 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON | MARKA HIPON BRAND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 533 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 43 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 439 MG | 2,333 MG |