SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS vs PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS: 5
vs
PINK SALMON: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 73 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 17.3 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 5.7 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKA POLLOCK FILLETS | PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 333 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 160 MG | 471 MG |