SKIM EVAPORATED MILK vs FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED GLUCOSE GEL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIM EVAPORATED MILK wins in 6 out of 9 nutrient categories
SKIM EVAPORATED MILK: 6
vs
FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED GLUCOSE GEL: 0
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKIM EVAPORATED MILK | FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED GLUCOSE GEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 10 g | 62.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKIM EVAPORATED MILK | FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED GLUCOSE GEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 3 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKIM EVAPORATED MILK | FRUIT PUNCH FLAVORED GLUCOSE GEL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 267 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 117 MG | 62 MG |